BARRENNESS OF THE IMAGINATIVE FACULTY IN THE PRODU
ng tists oory, and t t iers -- let it o all Babylon -- tenance troubled, even so enances, as of an individual man, been troubled; bo doupor-fixed, of struggling inevitable judgment.
Not all t is optically possible to be seen, is to be sure. tedly d individualities in a quot;Marriage at Cana,quot; by Veronese, or titian, to texture and colour of ts, ttering upon tal and fass; for at suco be curious. But in a quot;day of judgment,quot; or in a quot;day of lesser divine,quot; at t of Belse scene, as tual eye of an agent or patient in te scene inction. Not only ttire and jeo tical eye of tely as ticised picture,-- but peries of anatomical science, and studied diversities of posture in t subjects. them.
By a ion, t masters of painting got at true conclusions; by not sual appearances, t is, all t o be seen at any given moment by an indifferent eye, but only be supposed to see in tentous action. Suppose t of to be seen -- ectural proportions, differences of public and private buildings, men and tanding occupations, tures, attitudes, dresses, in some confusion truly, but p t eclipsing moment, y, and ies, o contemplate tanding at tle, t o turn over iquarian coolness ts and pans of Pompeii.
quot;Sun, stand till upon Gibea; ion, sees aug t-stretcer and lesser ligless to be seen s and defiles, and all tances and stratagems of erposition of t in ture of t by tist of t;Belsquot; no ignoble o an anecdote of t;dart traversequot; for some minutes, before it s mod