No trike you in type of y is t term  icated creature. take a man of t class of tion in C ty in  t, ty. In fact, t seems to me, ;gentle.quot; By gentleness I do not mean softness of nature or ;ty of t; says te Dr. D. J. Macgo;is not ty of a broken-ed, emasculated people. quot; But by t; gentlequot; I mean absence of  of anytrue Cype of y an air, so to speak, of a quiet, sober, cened melloal. Indeed tions of a real C redeemed, at least softened by ty of gentleness in  t t tancy in y. tupid, but ty in upidity. t ty in   to say is, t even in ts and blemiser of ts you. It is seldom t you ype, wively repulsive.

    I say t total impression  le, t le. y of inexpressible gentleness in t it is t of a combination of telligence. I ype of y to a domesticated animal. No ed animal so different from a  is someticated animal ively  inctively inguis is animal? It is intelligence. But telligence of a domesticated animal is not a telligence. It is not an intelligence o inct, sucelligence of telligence elligence , of t t may be called elligence of a domesticated animal is somete different from telligence. telligence of a domesticated animal is an intelligence inct, but from sympattac. A tands er not because udied Englisinct for t because taco er. t I call elligence, as distinguiselligence. It is ty ed from  is tic and true elligence, ype of y, to tleness.

    I once read someement made by a foreigner  t knorue. But, I t  is  t t taste for try. te of t of s of cleanliness and refinement