implies secrecy and mystery, true. But tter isn’t sealed and ture enclosed. t implication is, “Pray, keep our secret at all costs,” ation to love tter of rebuke.

    . Furtter confirms terpretation. t enougo be ambiguous—did sentionally perfume tter?—yet alluring enougo fire readers’ curiosity—is ttar or to enrapture tter to me, will surely  on Black.

    . I am Esto read nor e, but t and ting seems to say “Alas, I am rusing carelessly and  paying serious attention,”

    tters t tter elegantly as if caugle breeze convey t opposite message. Even  noter ten at t very moment, betrays a ploy no less obvious taken in each line.

    . ture sent along ter depicts pretty S old in tory t even I, Estanbul adore tory, but never o send an illustration relating to it.

    It ime to you fortunate literate people: A maiden o read a love letter ster is so surprising, exciting and disturbing t its o your becoming privy to  intimate affairs, asraugo read it once more. You read it again. In tter so many times t bot. Before long, sake tter in  statement t  to te places, sill unable to make sense of tares at tters of times I am so moved I forget t I myself can’t read or e and feel to embrace terate maidens o the page.

    truly accursed letter-readers; pray, don’t you turn out to be like one of takes tter in o touc again, desiring to look at it  understanding which words were

    spoken o  are you trying to do? You can’t read,  to look at?” Some of t even return tter, treati