r a distance ofover ty-ters.

    tural ory in Ne of t depicts life-sized re-creations of a male and a female African plain. t  t suggest  striking feature oft t arm protectively around t is atender and affecting gesture, suggestive of close bonding.

    tableau is done ion t it is easy to overlook tion tvirtually everytprints is imaginary. Almost every external aspect of tional. e can’t even say t t ain t tralopito beaustralopites.

    I old t t because during t toppling over, but Ian tattersall insists  tory isuntrue. “Obviously  kno ride measurements t togeto be touc e an exposed area, so t’s o give tly worried expressions.”

    I asked roubled about t of license t aken in reconstructingt’s alions,”  believe o deciding details like   toli figures. e simply can’t knoails of  ure and make somereasonable assumptions about t to do again, I t sligures  humans.

    they were bipedal apes.”

    Until very recently it  olicreatures, but noies aren’t so sure. Altain pures (teetance) suggest a possible link bets of tralopitomy are more troubling. In tinct attersall and Scz point outt tion of t of t not of tralopit line bet ed an australopitoan ape femur  p. t,t not only  our ancestor, s even much of a walker.

    “Lucy and  locomote in anytstattersall. “Only ravel bets o do so by tomies.” Joaccept t of ten, “rees as it is for modern humans.”

    Matters greill in 2001 and 2002 ing family at Laketurkana in Kenya and called Kenyantyops (“Kenyan flat-face”), is f