ON THE DUTY OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE
ess and consideration the
only spirit t can appreciate or deserves it. So is an change for
tter, like birthe body.
I do not ate to say, t themselves
Abolitionists s once effectually ,
boty, from t of Massacts,
and not till titute a majority of one, before they
suffer t to prevail t it is enough
if t ing for t other one.
Moreover, any man more rigitutes a
majority of one already.
I meet t, or its representative, the
State government, directly, and face to face, once a year -- no more
-- in ts tax-gathe only mode in which
a man situated as I am necessarily meets it; and it then says
distinctly, Recognize me; and t, t effectual, and,
in t posture of affairs, t mode of
treating on ttle
satisfaction , is to deny it then. My civil
neigax-gato deal h --
for it is, after all, t I quarrel
-- and arily co be an agent of t.
he
government, or as a man, until o consider wher he
sreat me, , as a neighbor
and urber of the peace,
and see if over truction to his neighborliness
a ruder and more impetuous t or speech corresponding
ion? I kno if one thousand, if one
en men wen men only --
ay, if one man, in tate of Massacts, ceasing to
ually to nership, and
be locked up in ty jail t ion
of slavery in America. For it matters not he beginning
may seem t