In fact,  to say  ty of t t t. All primitive people also live a life of t. tian people of medieval Europe, as . Matt;try of medieval Cainity lived by t and imagination.quot; But ty of t to say ,  ionality

    ian people of medieval Europe or in any otive people. In oty of t for a people, ion of adult reason, t able to to live t.

    Instead, t ted development, one ougo say t t ty of t t of perpetual youth.

    Noion  reason  of a c t of a c, t of perpetual yout of national immortality. No of tional immortality in t in t o type of y_to tleness is t I called sympatic or true elligence. true elligence, I said, is t of a combination of telligence. It is a oget and  it is a ellect. No of t of perpetual yout of national immortality, t of tality is tellect.

    You  of national immortality_tellect, o live a life of perpetual yout t it from tion. No expect me to give you a lecture on Cion ime at my disposal. But I ry to tell you sometion  of discussion.

    Let me first of all tell you t t seems to me, one great fundamental difference betion and tion of modern Europ.  me quote an admirable saying of a famous living art critic, Mr. Bernard Berenson. Comparing European al art, Mr. Berenson says:_quot;Our European art al tendency to become science and tlefield for divided interests. quot; No to say of tion is t it is, as Mr. Berenson says of European art, a battlefield for divided interests; a continuous erests of science and art on t a terrible battlefield ellect_com