is t eacom is God, not t God exists in eacom.

    It is not t some God is sitting enclosed inside an atom -- wever is, is God.

    God is t of love to quot;t which is.

    quot; quot;t rut God.

    But it makes no difference by w.

    I do not ask, t you begin to see God in everyone, I am saying: start looking inside.

    As soon as you look hin, you will disappear.

    And  youll see is God.

    Question 2

    ANOtAtION LEADS tO SAMADO GOD, t NEED IS tO GO tO tEMPLES? S E DO AAY IthEM?

    It is useless to go to temples, but it is equally useless to do ahem.

    o do a exist any temples be whey are.

    question is tting rid of t every so often trouble comes up.

    For example, Mo God is not to be found in idols, so t it meant idols sroyed.

    And tarted  making idols; noo destroy the idols.

    Noroyers are occupied day and nig o destroy the idols.

    Someone s God is to be found in destroying idols? God may not be present in an idol, but roying idols? And if God is present in destroying idols, ts t in t in too.

    And if  present in t in its destruction?

    I am not saying we semples.

    I am saying is t  realize trut God is everywhere.

    Once emple -- ts difficult to distinguisemple and a non-temple.

    tand, t , t  will be emple.

    tire world will be a holy place.

    t o create separate idols, because tever is will be his image.

    I am not advocating t you s involved in doing aemples,